Examinando por Materia "Percepción del estado de salud"
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Resultados por página
Opciones de clasificación
- PublicaciónAcceso abiertoDeterminantes socioeconómicos del acceso a los servicios de prevención primaria, consulta externa y urgencias en Colombia: Análisis secundario de la encuesta nacional de calidad de vida, 2013.(Bucaramanga : Universidad de Santander, 2014, 2014-12-12) Pinzón Ochoa, María Isabel; Angarita Fonseca, Adriana; Martínez Marín, Rocío del PilarObjective: Using the National Survey on Quality of Life in Colombia during 2013, found socioeconomic determinants of access to health services such as primary prevention, primary care consultation, and emergency consultation in the Colombian population. Methods: It was made a secondary analysis of the National Survey on Quality of Life in Colombia during 2013. At first, people older than 15 years were included, and those who belonged to special social security health regime were excluded. The dependent variables were: Without being sick and to attend for prevention to primary care at least once a year to the physician, dentist, or both. The second part of the analysis, people who had no health issues in the past 30 days was excluded. The dependent variable was: The formal health care provided in outpatient consultation and emergency cause by a health issue. To identify the determinants of real access was used generalized linear models for complex samples where the link function was logarithm ratio of the dependent variable and Poisson’s error distribution. The explanatory variables were categorized according to Andersen’s model (1995) in predisposing components by resources, capacity and need. Results: About the access to primary prevention, 50,532 individuals representing 31,968,124 Colombians were included. The results of the multivariate data analysis showed that the being male, people who belong to an ethnic group, those who worked in the week prior to the survey, which inhabited housing deficit, which had no classification of socioeconomic status, which were affiliated to the subsidized regime, that did not know if were affiliated to the social security health and who had filed out a petition right for protection had the probability of access to primary prevention health services significantly lower than the rest of the population. On the other hand, people between 39 and 103 years, that had a life partner, with secondary or higher level of education, middle or high socioeconomic status, in urban area, with permanent restrictions, poor health status or even very poor, who received shares promotion and prevention of the secretariat or municipality, that have received contributions, and that were in the top two quintiles of household income had a significantly higher probability of accessing prevention services. 5,758 individuals representing 3,348,977 Colombians were included in the analysis of access to emergency services or outpatient consultation. The prevalence of access to those was 74.3%. In multivariate data analysis, significant and positive association was found between access and poor or very poor health status; and a lower probability statistically significant of access to health services with the variable poverty perception and being part of subsidized regime or not knowing or not being affiliated to the social security health. Conclusions: The characteristics of resource capacity and necessity Andersen’s model still continue influencing access to primary health services and tertiary prevention in Colombia.